Friday, April 27, 2007
Chairs gone wild
So I thought, Hey, I should white wash these chairs and ....
paint them groovy colors. I present chair #1
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Wow!
Again, go see her (or at least read her writings).
Thursday, April 12, 2007
I beg your question?
Back to the logic, or my attempts to explain it to myself and possibly others.
How familiar does this sound (if you replace the necessary project and agency)?
“Unnecessary projects like the space elevator should be abandoned by all super cool space agencies.” (great example, huh?)
The speaker will then go on to talk about all the money being spent on this frivolous project, which nobody wants. The problem is that the speaker never established that this was a project that no one wanted or thought frivolous. In order to start this argument, the speaker needed to first gain consensus that the project was unnecessary or implausible. This is “begging the question,” when an individual moves onto the safe zone of the argument while ignoring the actually problem.
In a book I read recently, I found this fallacy displayed this way. Character A started a discussion about another character by saying that Character B was worthless. Character A then went on to argue that whatever happened to Character B was justifiable because of the aforementioned worthlessness. The problem, of course, is Character B’s worth was never established.
I find that this is a major pitfall for me in my writing. I want to claim things to be a certain way, so I can move on to pushing my characters forward. For example, I just love to claim that Character X’s idea was so ridiculous, and who would waste their time doing such a stupid thing, without ever going through the extra step of providing the logic behind why the idea was wrong. Oh, I do nitpick.
For the logic nerds, here are the forms (from Wikipedia):
Formally speaking, the simplest form of begging the question follows the following structure. For some proposition p:
- p implies p
- suppose p
- therefore, p.
However, the following structure is more common:
- p implies q
- q implies r
- r implies p
- suppose p
- therefore, q
- therefore, r
- therefore, p.
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Writing advice ...
My favorites are:
Writing the Breakout Novel
by Donald Maass (for writing)
and
The Insider's Guide to Getting an Agent
by Lori Perkins (agent advice)
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
Version control ... oh the humanity!
The one thing I have to say though is, version control is mucho important! I seriously just got a document set back (well into the 100+ pages range), and I have at least two versions in here. By versions, I mean v1 is what was handed to me, I edited it, becoming v1_edit or v1.1, they accepted the edits, and it became v2. I have at least one document from v1, which I edited but none of those edits are there, and another document that I wrote and that never saw an editor. Needless to say, it's a mess.
So, many of you here are writers with big novels, and presumably many of you are on your second, third, or fifth edit (that's me btw) of that novel. What system do you use to keep it all straight? Right now, I use dates in the document name (i.e. greatnovel_040407.doc). That is the name I give to my first major revision. I don't really like my system, but it works. Any better ideas?
This is my dog
This is my dog,